RECHERCHE
                 


NHL Forced to Release Statement After Controversy Over Department of Player Safety Rulings on Hits to the Head

PUBLICATION
Graham Montgomery
November 21, 2024  (7:41 PM)
SHARE THIS STORY

The NHL Department of Player Safety just released a video explaining why Zach Whitecloud was not given a suspension for his hit on Matthew Knies.

Whitecloud's hit last night sent the hockey world into a frenzy, sparking fierce debate online and in Toronto.

Former head coach Bruce Boudreau shared his thoughts, saying it should have been five and a game adding to the wide array of opinions on the topic.

Today, the NHL has doubled down on their stance that it was a clean hit, releasing a special video comparing the play to previous hits this season.

"On the hit by Whitecloud, Whitecloud hits through the body of Knies. While there is inarguably head contact here, we see Knies' entire body stopped in its tracks and driven backwards simultaneously with his head in a way that indicates the body absorbed the force of this check.

Whitecloud takes a good angle of approach, stepping up directly through Knies' core. And while Whitecloud does come up off the ice due to the force of the contact of the hit, he does not elevate up excessively or unnecessarily to pick the head as he delivers the check."

While fans were generally appreciative of the fact that we actually got an explanation this time, most are not buying it.

There are several sticking points. The most obvious one is that Whitecloud did in fact leave his feet to make the hit, which is fairly obvious based on the video evidence.

However, many fans also take grievance with the argument that the head was not the principle point of contact.

Just because Knies was completely stopped in his tracks does not mean the head was not the primary point of contact. It simply means that he was hit from an angle that completely killed his momentum.

Additionally, Knies was seen holding his head after the hit, a good indication that his body was fine because it did not absorb the force.

Regardless, it is nice to at least get an explanation. It might not be a satisfactory one, but that's just the way the NHL is most of the time.

POLL
NOVEMBRE 21   |   264 ANSWERS
NHL Forced to Release Statement After Controversy Over Department of Player Safety Rulings on Hits to the Head

Do you agree with the NHL Department of Player Safety's explanation for why Zach Whitecloud was not given a penalty for his hit on Matthew Knies?

Yes6625 %
No19875 %
LIST OF POLLS